It seemed like old times when I plopped down in front of the Saipan Tribune and read "GOP meeting ends in shouting match As leadership railroads proposed amendments".
I had to glance at the masthead to be sure I wasn't reading the late lamented Commonwealth Examiner. (I also checked for JJ Cruz in the letters to the Editor, but couldn't even find Holani Smith.)
The story, headline included, was so slanted I'm surprised the words didn't slide off of the page.
Now, from the little I know, I'm inclined to sympathize with the Precinct IV club (club? nevermind), but my BS detector went off so loudly that dogs a block away started barking.
So, some questions for someone, anyone, who was there: Was former House Speaker Rasa given as much time as the other speakers? Were there other people waiting for a chance to speak? How and why did Mr. Pangelinan "cut Rasa short"? What did Mr. Camacho say when he "spoke in defense of the amendments". "Several others" spoke, but what did they say?"
Enquiring minds want to know.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
2 comments:
Can Rasa even vote? I thought he was a convicted felon.
I dunno. No handy access to the Commonwealth Code and it would be tedious to wade through all of the Public Laws.
Post a Comment